The Borrowing Cost That Is Not About the Borrower
Lenders to America's investment-grade companies were paid 82 basis points over Treasuries on October 8. That is the option adjusted spread on the ICE BofA US Corporate Index, as the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis publishes it.
Six days earlier it was 85. The premium narrowed during the same week that long term Treasury yields peaked.
The all-in yield on that index tells a different story. It reached 6.03 percent on October 2 and October 5, then eased to 5.94 by October 8.
Coverage has read those yields as a debt test for corporate America. Bank of America cut its forecast for October investment-grade bond sales to 110 billion dollars from about 160 billion.
The key observation is that the premium for corporate risk barely moved while the Treasury yield beneath it hit a 24-year high.
A corporate bond yield has two parts. One is what the government pays to borrow for the same length of time, and the other is what the borrower pays on top.
The first part moved. The ten-year Treasury passed 5.35 percent on October 7, its highest since 2002, and the thirty-year reached 5.70 percent.
The second part did not. Eighty-two basis points is the whole of what an investment-grade lender now collects for taking corporate credit risk.
The split shows up at the bottom of the ladder. Yields on debt rated CCC and below reached 17 percent this month, the highest since May 2020.
The premium on that paper widened to 12 percentage points, the widest since 2022. Against 82 basis points at the top, that is not one market moving together.
Would You Spend 60 Seconds to Save $29.97?
That's what my Safe Trade Options Formula costs on our website.
Through this link, it's free. No card. No strings.
Inside: the 5-part formula I use to make every options trade a safe trade.
This is a rate-premium gap.
A borrower's cost is the government's rate plus its own premium. For most of the market, only the first number has moved.
At the bottom of the ratings ladder, the second one did the moving. That pattern points to lenders sorting borrowers rather than backing away from all of them.
One other reading is credible. A thin premium at the top can also mean those balance sheets are sound.
The index does not separate that from a crowded market for safe paper.
The deals themselves point the same way. Paramount Skydance sold 52 billion dollars of bonds to fund its purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery.
Demand for the two-year notes ran at nearly double the demand for the thirty-year bonds. The hesitation sat with the length of the loan rather than with the borrower.
That fits a market repricing time rather than credit.
The calendar matters because of what is due. Moody's has estimated that a record 1.45 trillion dollars of investment-grade debt matures between 2026 and 2030.
A borrower's cost is the government's rate plus its own premium. For most of the market, only the first number has moved.
At the bottom of the ratings ladder, the second one did the moving. That pattern points to lenders sorting borrowers rather than backing away from all of them.
One other reading is credible. A thin premium at the top can also mean those balance sheets are sound.
The index does not separate that from a crowded market for safe paper.
The deals themselves point the same way. Paramount Skydance sold 52 billion dollars of bonds to fund its purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery.
Demand for the two-year notes ran at nearly double the demand for the thirty-year bonds. The hesitation sat with the length of the loan rather than with the borrower.
That fits a market repricing time rather than credit.
The calendar matters because of what is due. Moody's has estimated that a record 1.45 trillion dollars of investment-grade debt matures between 2026 and 2030.
What really happened in Washington?
The Truth About Trump And Xi Jinping
President Trump just sat across from Xi Jinping – and I believe the fate of the U.S. dollar was in the room with them.
As China’s Premier arrived for the summit, the press obsessed over tariffs, Iranian sanctions, fentanyl, the military ceremony and the lavish state dinner.
Those were the things everyone was supposed to see.
But the most consequential part of this summit – something that could impact the financial life of every American – was never even mentioned.
I don’t believe Trump brought Xi Jinping to Washington merely to extend a trade truce or discuss sanctions.
I believe he was there to strengthen America’s grip on the most critical resource of the 21st century.
America desperately needs this important resource to reverse the decline of the U.S. dollar.
It’s a resource so powerful that Vladimir Putin has said whoever controls it will “become the ruler of the world.”
No one seems to be asking why Trump really filled the White House with the leaders of the world’s most powerful technology and financial companies…
Elon Musk. Jeff Bezos. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang. Google’s Sundar Pichai. Apple’s Tim Cook. OpenAi’s Sam Altman. BlackRock’s Larry Fink and Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser.
Or what these men and women – who between them control more capital than most nations – were really there to discuss.
And almost nobody seems to have connected what happened inside that room to a landmark pact signed by 13 nations inside the State Department… a pact designed to cut China out of the biggest investment wave in financial history.
And I believe what I’ve uncovered could profoundly affect everything about your financial future – from your stock portfolio to the purchasing power of every dollar you’ve saved.
In my new documentary, I expose exactly what I believe Trump is really doing, how he has completely bypassed Congress to make it happen – and I share the five mission-critical assets sitting at the heart of a shocking, multi-trillion-dollar gambit to reset the U.S. Dollar.
Where the premium is set
Bank lending standards for business loans. The quarterly survey asks loan officers whether they tightened terms on commercial and industrial credit, and those terms move before bond prices do. Tightening alongside an 82 basis point bond premium would show the two credit channels disagreeing. Easing would show them agreeing. (Source: Federal Reserve)
Monthly investment-grade bond issuance. This counts the deals that actually priced, against forecasts that are being cut. Issuance holding near forecast would show borrowers accepting the all-in cost. A shortfall would show them waiting out the Treasury leg. (Source: SIFMA)
The speculative-grade default rate. This is the share of low-rated borrowers that missed a payment or restructured, and it is published monthly. A rise toward the widened premium would show the market pricing something already underway. A flat rate against a 12-point premium would show the premium running ahead of the defaults. (Source: S&P Global Ratings)
A borrowing cost names a price, not a reason. Two different events produce the same number, and the number does not say which one happened.
Talk soon,
The Playbook Daily
