Coach Rose 14%. Kate Spade Fell 7%. The Economy Wasn’t the Difference.

Tapestry reported on August 13 that Coach sales rose 14% in constant currency during its fiscal fourth quarter while Kate Spade sales fell 7%. That 21-point gap appeared inside one company, during one reporting period, against many of the same pressures on household budgets and discretionary spending.

The key observation is that the economy can set the conditions without determining every company’s result.

Tapestry reported quarterly revenue of $1.88 billion, up 8.9% from a year earlier. Coach generated $1.64 billion in revenue, rising 14% in constant currency. Kate Spade generated $235.1 million, down 7%.

The gap extended beyond one quarter. For the full fiscal year, Coach sales rose 23%, while Kate Spade sales fell 11%.

Tapestry has been working to revive Kate Spade, while Coach has continued to attract younger customers through new products and targeted marketing.

Tapestry shares fell as much as 16.9% on August 13 as investors weighed the company’s outlook and the continued weakness at Kate Spade.

This is an earnings-quality test.

When spending becomes more selective, category averages can become less useful. Two businesses can face the same inflation, interest rates, consumer confidence, and household budgets yet produce very different results.

The difference can come down to what each business controls: product, brand relevance, pricing, marketing, and execution.

Get in before this October IPO

Anthropic — the maker of Claude AI — is going public.

In fact, reports say it's just days away now.

Perhaps as soon as October.

The value of the company has doubled since the announcement.

Many experts think Anthropic could be worth $3 trillion by IPO day.

Google, Amazon and Nvidia are all heavily invested in this IPO.

Even Microsoft, who used to be associated with OpenAI's ChatGPT, is invested in Anthropic.

Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan are tripping over each other to get a private stake before the IPO.

Even whole countries are invested …

Including the United Arab Emirates, Singapore and Qatar.

That's because Anthropic is a rare breed … the rarest, in fact.

You see, venture capitalists call a private company worth over a $1 billion a unicorn.

$10 billion and it's a decacorn. 

$100 billion is a hectocorn.

But what do you call a private company worth over a trillion dollars?

Anthropic is there, right now. 

The first of its kind.

It's worth more than every American airline — combined.

It's even bigger than the U.S. defense budget …

Anthropic's annualized revenue grew by 80 times in the first quarter.

They've already filed the paperwork for an IPO …

Some estimates say they are going public as early as October.

Most analysts agree, it's going to happen sometime this fall at worst.

Now, here's what's really exciting …

You can get a stake in this company, right now.

Today.

Before it goes public.

And have an opportunity to cash in on day one of this IPO.

One key signal is the gap between similar businesses. The wider that gap becomes, the harder it is to explain performance with the economy alone.

Another signal is whether the difference lasts. One strong quarter can reflect timing. A pattern across several quarters can suggest something more specific about the businesses themselves.

That is what makes the Coach-Kate Spade comparison useful. The divergence did not appear only in one three-month period.

A common misread is to use one company’s results as a verdict on the consumer.

Coach growing 14% does not mean every household feels strong. Kate Spade falling 7% does not mean discretionary spending has collapsed.

Both conclusions ask company results to answer a question they cannot answer alone.

Another mistake is assuming businesses in the same category should move together. A selective customer can keep spending while becoming much more particular about where that money goes.

Focus on who is earning the customer, not just how much the customer is spending.

Broad economic data tells us what businesses are dealing with. It does not tell us which businesses will handle those conditions best.

That distinction matters when demand is uneven. Consumers do not spread their budgets evenly across companies. They choose among brands, products, prices, and experiences.

Where the money goes can therefore matter as much as whether total spending rises or falls.

The economy creates the backdrop. Individual businesses still have to compete inside it.

When closely related businesses produce very different results, the gap can be more informative than the category label. It helps separate what is happening to everyone from what is happening to one company.

Talk soon,
The Playbook Daily